Sketch Me

The 10 or so centimetres of white stuff that fell on Tuesday wouldn’t be the only snow job that day. It seemed like there was a veritable blizzard at Council as the representatives for the Allanburg Energy From Waste Project made their pitch to the General Committee.

Just to explain, this project is to build a plant on Allanport Road, half-way to Port Robinson, which will take garbage (annually 140,000 tons – or tonnes – it sounds the same) and burn it to make steam which will, in turn, drive a turbine to create electricity. And it requires a statement of support “in principle” form the municipalities in order to move on to the next step.

The presentation started off with cute phrases like imagine a place “where trash becomes treasure” and claims of 200 (temporary) construction jobs and 50 eventual full-time jobs, creating enough electric power for 15,000 homes, while having an impact of $180 million on the Region (they didn’t say over how long). The Community Relations Officer then introduced the concept of the 4 R’s (and you just finally learned what the original 3 R’s stood for). The fourth one, apparently, stands for Recover which is what I, in my naiveté, thought was done with all recycled products at the recovery stations.

That rosy picture painted, the mayor then proceeded to point out that the Region, earlier that day, voted almost unanimously to support the project (one Regional Councillor was in the bathroom, we were told, so that counted as a “no” vote – apparently, in municipal government it’s forbidden to reserve judgment).

While several Councillors pointed out that they’d been given little information upon which to make their decision, no one would make the move to defer the item pending more information.

Councillor Paone would lead the charge in asking questions of the presenters. Just about everything he asked resulted in a reply from the tech that, first of all, it was a great question (they apparently all the questions were great, unilike the answers). The balance of the answer was that he’d get the Councillor information or an example of what’s done in Germany.

When Councillor Paone aske where the garbage would come from, summoning an image of truckloads of garbage being brought into Niagara, the reply he got was that they had a contractor who would figure out the sources. He might as well have responded with, “Hey! No problem! I got a guy.”

A common answer was that whatever it was, was well within government guidelines. As Councillor Paone would point out, government guidelines have little to do with safety and much to do with politics. And the additional reply that they meet EU standards and that the EU has the toughest in the world doesn’t really answer anything. Councillor Paone – and I – want to know what the levels are.

Mayor Luciani and the tech both leaned on the fact that their approval wasn’t an agreement, but just permission to move the process along. That, however, isn’t how the template they provided reads (you can read it for yourself –,4341&preview=4431 Page 226). Ignoring the comments on the company’s explanation, the wording on this template sure reads like support for the project.

I’m not opposed to the project per se, and I went to Council with an open mind about a project that could do a lot of good. I’d like to see new jobs and clean energy as much as the anyone. But I’m extremely disappointed that the company came asking for support and then provided no concrete answers, not before the meeting nor during it.

Also, I’m disappointed that Council, despite their misgivings, decided to vote in favour of the “support in principle”, all except Paone who abstained, counted as a “No” vote. The justification seems to be that this was just permission to go one to the next step, and the environmental organizations will rake them over the coals at the later steps. For a Council that historically asks staff for a half-dozen reports before deciding just about anything, they were awfully fast to pass this one.

I maintain that the responsibility lies right here with the representatives of the people who will be most affected if something goes wrong. And I’m not ready to just accept anyone’s word on it in light of the lack of information forthcoming, something that should have been both expected and offered by 1931146 Inc. Just remember, every technology is clean, safe and efficient, right up until the time that that it’s proven that isn’t.

By the end, I felt that the shovelling I’d been doing earlier that day wasn’t nearly done yet. I first had to dig out my table in City Hall.


  1. Also, seems like a pretty strange process where the proponent of the project need various levels of gov’t to give approval in principle for the proponent to apply for a permit to the Independent Energy Producers Association…and yet the proponent only gives the sketchiest of info. ALSO, If I understood what was mentioned during the meeting, the information package didn’t even contain a map showing the location of the subject property!!?? The presenter also stated that the property was zoned HEAVY industrial, but I was under the impression that it was DRY industrial…will have to check that out further…can’t get my hands on a copy of the Comprehensive Zoning Bylaw at the moment!

  2. Thanks for the report, Tony!
    Since this proposed location is near my Port Robinson neck of the woods, it especially caught my interest.
    1. Just wondering if an actual/exact site was identified,and wondering how large is it? East or West side of Allanport Road…how many acres/hectares…was there a drawing on display showing the proposed site plan, locating buildings, roadways, etc. on the property. NO ONE asked for that???
    2. I presume NO ONE on Regional Council or City Council actually knows the current condition of Allanport Road from Barron Road south to the Turner Road road allowance. The surface is extremely deteriorated…(check it out!) to the point that It should easily win the WORST ROAD IN ONTARIO AWARD…after I nominate it this year. My point is that I envision a constant flow of heavy garbage trucks that the road cannot currently withstand…without a complete rebuilding right down to the bottom of the gravel base of the road bed. So I assume that NO ONE was informed enough to ask if the current road infrastructure is capable of withstanding the beating expected from the proposed additional traffic.
    So NO ONE also asked on whose budget is the required road-building that will be needed prior to the opening of this facility?…and at what cost??
    3. Generating electricity from STEAM?. The properties along Allanport Road are zoned as DRY INDUSTRIAL…so where does the water come from and who pays for the infrastructure cost to bring adequate water service and presumable sewer service to the property?? NO ONE asked that??
    4. NO ONE asked how the garbage is handled/stored from the time it is unloaded from the trucks until it is burned???
    I can envision the potential for strong, undesirable, rotten odours…and no one asked about that??
    5. Long line-ups/back-ups of traffic and interruptions and delays to traffic flow at the Barron Road railway crossing can be anticipated. NO ONE mentioned that??
    5. So NO ONE on Regional or Thorold Councils stood up as the DEFENDERS of the interests of the RURAL RESIDENTS of Thorold living in this area, who would be affected by this development, to ask the above questions??
    If not, then why are we NOT being properly represented as Regional and City of Thorold taxpayers?
    6. JUST ASKING??
    7. These are just a few of the most basic common-sense questions that quickly come to mind, having lived in the area for 30 years! I am sure I will have a LOT MORE questions as time goes on!!

    • I did get a chance to watch the replay of the meeting on Cogeco yesterday. Kudos to Councillor Paone for the research he did on the subject of emissions and that there is someone on Council with his background to know the right questions to ask! Actually, he was very impressive…because he flushed out a couple of instances where the presenters actually presented misleading/inaccurate info…and when he called them on it, they backtracked and acted like they didn’t know they had “misstated”. That was a HUGE signal to me that there is a lot to be suspicious about this proposal. Hope to re-watch the meeting and possibly post further comments! Thanks, Tony, for posting info about this presentation…because no mention was made of it in the Thorold Council “briefs” in THE STANDARD!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.